- How good is affinity photo skin#
- How good is affinity photo full#
- How good is affinity photo software#
- How good is affinity photo professional#
As I always point out on their forums: why is it that a simple tool like the pen tool, operates different in PS, IL, and IN?Īffinity Photo (Beta) = 581mb vs. The same goes for almost every single design package they now bundle in CC subscriptions.
How good is affinity photo full#
It is so full of outdated legacy code, including outdated frameworks as to be painful for the engineers to even add new functionality for fear of breaking something. IMHO (and I've stated often enough on the Adobe Forums), Photoshop needs a complete rewrite sooner rather than later. Then I allowed myself to retouching both images using only the spot healing brush tool for five minutes each. It might even be a great tool if you do not plan on exporting the image for print but only publish it to a small web size.įor this comparison to be meaningful, I opened up the picture with a blank layer over the base image in both applications.
How good is affinity photo skin#
I do not think it is great for close-ups as it still kind of softens up the skin texture but it is usable. I prefer using a frequency separation or correcting the blemishes by dodging and burning them. Affinity seems to do a way better job. With Photoshop, I try avoiding using it on large areas as it tends to crush the texture and make the skin look soft.
It uses the same kind of algorithm and I wanted to see if it worked as good as the fill content-aware tool. Then I tried the spot healing brush tool on a beauty-type photograph.
How good is affinity photo software#
So I tried with both software and voilà:īefore and after with Affinity Photo beta Spot Healing Brush Tool vs. Here is a crop of a recent picture I took in Paris where in the final image I wanted the cyclist to be removed. With Affinity, creating a simple selection and filling it using the inpainting fill option almost gets the job done every time, and might require just a few clicks with the clone stamp tool to make it perfect.
With Photoshop that usually means a few minutes spent using the clone stamp tool. When shooting outdoors it is not rare to have something useless or distracting in the background. Let's compare two examples to show you what I mean. It is hard to understand how a beta version of a software that comes out of nowhere can beat the functions of a software developed by such a big company like Adobe. But now with what Affinity offers, the Photoshop versions of these tools seem to be totally outdated. When I first tried it, I thought something was wrong because it worked so well. When Adobe added those functions in Photoshop everyone was raving about it. Now, one feature that really caught my attention was the spot healing brush tool (inpainting brush tool) and the content-aware fill tool (fill inpainting tool). I decided to give it a try, and it is good… really good! It is still a beta version but it seems quite stable, offering most of the important things you might need from Photoshop, and even more. Then I stumbled upon a few videos showing how the software worked and a few fellow photographers told me how great it was.
How good is affinity photo professional#
When I saw his articles I thought it was another open-source software like GIMP that would be good, but not good enough for a professional working environment.
However, after having installed Affinity I must admit that I might "cheat" on Adobe Photoshop.Īustin Rogers wrote about Affinity twice here on Fstoppers ( his first impressions and a marketing video). After a few years of trials and errors I am finally somewhere I feel comfortable with my post-production. Until a few days ago, I did not think I would hesitate changing my retouching routine. It is a staple in my workflow alongside Capture One and Photo Mechanic. It works great and every photographer has gotten used to it. Photoshop has been around for quite some time now.
0 kommentar(er)
